‘those dogs are a credit to you’
July 29th, 2011 § Leave a Comment
I continued with the same exercise and the penny might have dropped… That, or Grey has learnt to run Back, whatever happens! We’ll know more next time I run the full drill.
Today I thought to myself that Slate needs to run this drill too: At the moment, when Adam is home, he takes Slate off into the woods and practises ‘Over’ with her on fallen trees and fences – whilst I stay in the open space with Grey and do walking baseball. But Slate is losing out, with this. So I think I’m going to copy the cheat sheets and give them to Adam to do with Slate.
Meanwhile, today I was training the dogs on the football pitch and this guy drove in and parked and watched. I think he must have been waiting for something or someone or having a break.
First I had Grey sitting in a sit-stay, whilst I did walking baseball with Slate. Then I switched them over and gave Grey a turn. I left them both in a sit stay whilst I went to the car to get a tuggy toy as a reward.
When I’d finished and put them both back in the car, the guy called out of his window to me: ’Those dogs are a credit to you!’
Well, that was very nice! Sometimes I get all caught up on a small detail I’m working on and I don’t see the overall picture, which is just how well trained they are.
walking baseball progress update
July 27th, 2011 § Leave a Comment
Grey is, I think, making slow progress on walking baseball. I am still having a problem with stickiness on casts. On these instances, if she goes before she is ‘ready’, then she will go in the wrong direction. It’s as if the stickiness is her thinking about the cast I’m giving and the dummies and which one to go for. If this is right, then as she gains in confidence, the stickiness should disappear. This is the premiss I’ve been working on, anyway. Quite what is required to give her the confidence she needs, I don’t know. I’ve shortened the casts, I’ve moved right up close to her. It all seems to make no difference, her brain is computing away and will not be rushed!
On Friday, when we last ran the drill, I decided to stick to one cast and just practise it over and over until it was going well, with no stickiness. The cast was a Back cast, with a distraction/secondary dummy to the Left (9pm). This was tricky because she turns on that side, so it meant the distraction (suction) of the secondary dummy was all the greater.
I did feel that, by the end of the session, I was statistically getting more going-first-time than stickiness. But I didn’t ever get, say, 5 consecutive going-first-times, so I could be sure it was absolutely solid. So I will continue with this at our next session. Meantime I continue to look like I’m doing a strange form of aerobics in the park, watched by a bemused Grey…
facts about SRHPs in the UK
July 24th, 2011 § 8 Comments
I’m reluctant for this revealing thread on the Working HPRs forum to quietly fade away, so I will repeat some of the most significant facts here. I stress that these are facts and that therefore they cannot be said to be biassed, unfair, libellous or prejudicial. The vast majority of this information is freely and publicly available from the Kennel Club, from Mate Select, and in the Breed Record Supplements. Other information I have received via email from the Slovakian breed club.
- Since 2003, there have been 409 KC registered SRHPs in the UK (excluding the 5 original Emmaclan imports). This means that there are now more dogs registered in the UK, than in their native Slovakia. To restate: We are breeding these dogs more prolifically in the UK than they are being bred in their country of origin. For more information on the numbers of dogs in various countries and on the number bred in Slovakia, see this translation of a German article.
- 47% of these 409 dogs bred in the UK since 2003, have been bred by Stormdancer or Rosetinted, and so it can be said that these two kennels are, between them, responsible for breeding almost half of all SRHPs registered in the UK.
- Despite there being 13 early imports, not all of these dogs were bred from – only 8 were. Consequently, these 409 KC reg SRHPs are all descended from 8 imports.
- Furthermore, of these 8 dogs, many were siblings. For example, the 13 originally imported dogs were: The Emmaclan imports: Amie and Amaretto von Kapffelsen (siblings); and Spek, Santal and Supa zo Sorosa (siblings). The Aucassin imports: Setsuhen, Shiro, Sora, Shika & Sholto de l’Etang aux Colverts (siblings). The Stormdancer imports: Evar and Eny Kaicul (siblings) and Argo od Vitalosa. So, the 8 of these imports which were bred from were not unrelated, with different pedigrees: Siblings have identical pedigrees and carry almost identical genetic material. The 8 dogs used probably equate to about 3-4 different pedigrees. So, in fact, those 409 KC reg SRHPs are all descended from 3-4 different pedigrees.
- Even then, those 3-4 different pedigrees were not totally different. Many of them contained the same dogs.
- Compare the UK situation to the situation in Slovakia, as discussed in this article: There are just under 400 dogs registered in Slovakia. These dogs are the product of 12 stud dogs and 18 bitches, making a total of 30 breeding dogs, with varying pedigrees. Slovakia, being the country of origin, is also permitted to breed SRHPs to the foundation breeds (Weimaraner, GWP and Cesky Fousek), enabling them access to new blood and lines instantly. That is: The UK has produced slightly more SRHPs than the country of origin, from a fraction of the gene pool.
- The three most popular UK stud dogs in the breed are, in order of popularity:
- Argo od Vitalosa (Stormdancer); 20 litters. Argo od Vitalosa has, alone, sired 161 puppies. He has a COI of 18.9%.
- Aucassin Tonto (Rosetinted); 11 litters and a COI of 20.3%.
- Evar Kaicul (Stormdancer); 10 litters and (as discussed below) carrying lines which have been banned in Slovakia, due to serious health defects.
- Aucassin Tonto (Rosetinted), the 2nd most popular stud in the breed, has a COI (breeding co-efficiency index, or measure of inbreeding) of 20.3%. The breed average is currently 11.5%. Litters should not be bred, which have a COI of 20.3%, let alone the result of such matings being used as hugely popular stud dogs in a minority breed where genetic diversity is already a problem. Even as I type, Rosetinted have 2 litters on the ground, both out of Aucassin Tonto. One of them is out of a bitch which is not even hip-scored (Abreast Yellow Dandy).
- Evar Kaicul, the 3rd most popular stud in the breed, is descended from a pudelpointer line (Pine Ridge Fred/Alf z Bitesska): His grandfather is Alf z Bitesska. The Slovakian breed club have suspended all brood bitches and studs from these lines; these lines are now not present in Slovakian stock and have been successfully eliminated in the country of origin. The Slovakian breed club believe that dogs descended from Pine Ridge Fred/Alf z Bitesska have the last two ribs fused to the breast bone, meaning they are unable to move. This causes dogs descending from these lines difficulties in breathing and physical endurance. This fault was still present at least 2 generations later, resulting in the decision to eliminate the stock from the Slovakian breeding programme. This was no small decision and reflects how serious this condition was believed to be, by the Slovakian breed club. However, Evar Kaicul, carrying these lines, had already been imported to the UK by this time. It is of some concern that Evar Kaicul is even now at stud in the UK. He has already sired 10 litters and 7 of his progeny have been hip-scored – which is an indication that they will be bred from: His genes, banned from the Slovakian breeding programme, are now unavoidably part of UK SRHP stock.
- Argo od Vitalosa (the most popular stud in the UK, sire of 20 litters), was one of a litter of 5 puppies. This litter, born in Slovakia, was inspected at 6 wks old by Michal Urban, the secretary of the Slovakian breed club – all litters bred in Slovakia are inspected. Although Argo od Vitalosa’s teeth were fine, three of his siblings had severe underbites – a condition which is often hereditary. Bite issues are a known issue within the breed, with instances both in Slovakia and in the UK. It is a concern that a dog from lines that have definitely produced this fault should have dominated the UK gene pool so heavily, siring 161 out of 409 registered UK SRHPs. Not only that, but he has a COI of 18.9%, when the breed average is 11.5%.
- As is evident, there are causes for concern regarding all 3 of the most popular stud dogs in the breed. If these dogs were just 3 dogs out of even 15 stud dogs, then it would matter much less to the breed. The stud dog duties would have been shared around those 15 dogs and each dog’s individual contribution to the gene pool would have been much less. Should any problems crop up, it would then be comparatively easy to eliminate them. Instead, however, these 3 dogs have been repeatedly and excessively bred into the UK SRHP population.
- New lines have recently been imported by Stormdancer, by way of Beno, Britt and Bella Meskov Dvor. This is excellent. However, again it should be noted that these are 3 siblings, representing only 1 new pedigree for the UK. Aucassin plans to import a stud dog out of a recent litter in Slovakia – however this pup is out of a dam bred by Aucassin, and therefore is only 50% new genetic material for the breed. These are good moves, but no where near the scale of what is needed for the breed.
- The SRHP Club’s Kennel Club ‘health co-ordinator’, whose task it is to liaise with the KC on issues of health in the breed, is also the owner of two of the most prolific stud dogs in the breed (Stormdancer). As owners are supposed to report health issues to the health co-ordinator, there is obviously a conflict of interest if the health co-ordinator owns two of the most popular stud dogs in the breed – which are likely to have sired many puppies reported on.
- There are currently no health requirements for the breed under the KC Accredited Breeder Scheme. This means that someone can be an ‘Accredited Breeder’ without even having had their dogs’ hip-scored. Indeed, this is how Rosetinted can be KC Accredited Breeders, yet currently have a litter out of an un-hipscored dog (Abreast Yellow Dandy). It is the UK breed club which is supposed to advise the KC on what the health requirements are for the ABS.
- Neither of the two most prolific breeders (Rosetinted and Stormdancer) compete with their dogs in any way other than conformation. Therefore the dogs’ working abilities go untested before breeding. It is a well-known fact that, genetically speaking, if you’re not actively breeding for a trait, you are breeding against it. (Because you are leaving it to chance that the dog possesses this trait.) It is insufficient to attest to a dog’s working ability based on non-working behaviour witnessed by its owner (i.e. ‘my dog loves to hunt for rabbits on walks, therefore he has good working instincts, therefore we can breed from him’). Just as those who show will understand that it’s not enough to say ‘I think my dog looks nice – therefore it must be a good specimen and worth breeding from’. A dog needs to be worked, and it needs some form of independent and unbiassed assessment of working ability in order to be said to have any.
- Finally, there are already anecdotal reports of serious health conditions afflicting dogs in the breed. These include accounts of discospondylitis; gastrointestinal infections of campylobacter and giardia throughout early puppyhood; severe and debilitating bite faults requiring surgery; undiagnosed chronic pain, often on rising from a lying position – this has received various diagnoses from sterile meningitis to discospondylitis, but the symptoms are remarkably similar, despite different diagnoses; epilepsy; alopecia (hair loss/bald areas); and several cases of severe hip-dysplacia requiring complete hip replacements.
- Import more stud dogs from Slovakia. The Pet Passport scheme is changing in January 2012, so it should be possible to import puppies at around 15wks instead of the current 10 months. It is perfectly possible for a ‘pet’ owner to import a puppy – don’t think that this is only an option for those ‘serious’ people in the breed. If you are looking for a puppy in the UK at the moment, be aware that you are likely lining the pockets of those who are over-breeding this breed. Do you want to further support such breeders? If puppies were not in such great demand, a clear message would be conveyed to UK breeders to stop breeding. Indeed, there are signs that the UK market has reached saturation point at this stage: There has recently been an entire litter of 8 SRHPs abandoned at the RSPCA Brighton, because their breeder was unable to sell them. Some puppies in litters bred by Ansona and Panoply in March and April of this year have yet to find homes, according to Champdogs, despite now being 17wks and 12wks respectively. A litter of Aucassin puppies whelped in January have, all seven, been kept by the breeder ‘as there was very little interest’. Our own provisional list fell apart leading to our decision not to breed Grey. This should send a clear message to UK breeders that the market is no longer there, for SRHPs going to pet homes. If you are looking for a puppy in Slovakia, I’d be happy to put you in touch with a couple of Slovakian breeders who can help.
- Slow down the rate of breeding. We are breeding far too prolifically for the small gene pool available in the UK. If breeders cannot find a suitable stud dog which they are satisfied is free from faults, and results in a low COI, then they should not breed! All breeders are the guardians and custodians of the breed. Individual breeding decisions may seem unimportant in the scheme of things, but the cumulative effect of all these individual decisions is dire. Know what the overall picture of the breed is at the current time. Consider proposed matings in the light of that bigger picture. Breeders do not have to have litters from their bitches.
- If you must breed, consider going abroad to use a stud dog. The existing lines in the UK have been excessively overused for such a small gene pool. There are many studs from new lines in Slovakia and one in the Netherlands. With the Pet Passport scheme, it is possible to fly or drive a bitch abroad for mating. If it seems too much effort to go abroad, then perhaps this minority breed is not one for you to be breeding.
- Hip-test all breeding stock and do not breed from those dogs with scores over the average of 10. (There are instances of bitches with above average scores being bred to studs, also with above average scores. If breeders are going to claim that their bitch is exceptional enough to breed from her, despite her poor hip-test results, then she should at least be bred to a stud with a below-average score. If such a stud isn’t available, then the question about whether she should be bred at all is raised.) Stud dogs should not be mated to unscored bitches. (There are instances of some of these top-three studs being bred to unscored bitches.)
- Breeders should endorse the KC registrations of ALL offspring: One way to widen the gene pool is to stop the 2nd, 3rd, 4th generation of UK-only dogs.
- Check the dentition of all breeding stock and ensure bites are correct. If buying a puppy, check the teeth of other puppies in the litter and not only the puppy you purchase (especially if you will maybe want to breed from that puppy). There are currently bite issues in the breed, cropping up amongst different lines. The result of bite problems can be traumatic for both dog and owner, as discussed on this thread.
- We should not breed from dogs with Evar Kaicul in their pedigree, because we should follow the lead given by the country of origin and aim to eliminate these lines from UK stock.
- The only reason, in any breed of dog, to be bringing more puppies into the world, is to better the breed. To better the breed, you need to be objectively assessing breeding stock so that only the best are bred from. That means – the BEST – not breeding every example of the breed, willy-nilly. This is a working breed, with working instincts which have been carefully developed and bred for, over decades in Slovakia, through selective breeding. To believe that we can maintain these working instincts whilst abandoning any testing or selection for them is simply wrong – we cannot. These dogs have been bred to hunt all day. This is what differentiates the breed from a grey labradoodle. To preserve the breed, working qualities must be assessed before breeding. Even if you are reluctant to compete, ask your friends what they think of your dog’s performance on shoots or when you rough-shoot. Get unbiassed opinions and try to be objective. If you don’t shoot or work your dog, my opinion is that you really should not be breeding this breed because you cannot assess these qualities – and traits which are not selected for are (it has been proven) selected against. You cannot claim that your dog likes to hunt rabbits on walks, and therefore has a good nose, and therefore can be bred from. Just as you cannot claim that you think your dog looks nice, so you should breed from her. You need unbiassed, independent assessments of your dog’s working ability. If you want to breed from your SRHP, it is your duty to get involved in working him/her.
the season with no puppies
July 22nd, 2011 § Leave a Comment
Grey started her season today. I’m feeling very sad about our decision not to breed her, although I’m sure it was the right one.
It is just hard to sit by and watch the season come and go, when it was supposed to be a time with so much planned.
On a happier note, we are still persevering with the walking baseball and I think it is really helping her casts.
And I think we will be able to attend the SRHP working test, as it should be day 22 for her. A good bum wash and she should be good to go.
eyes and their vicissitudes
July 18th, 2011 § 2 Comments
Took Slate to the vet today because she’s been having an on-and-off problem with red and itchy eyes. We’re not sure if it’s a bacterial infection or an allergy, but we suspect the latter.
We saw our regular vet, Paul, who couldn’t see anything wrong with them under fluroscein and who tested her tear production and said that was fine. So it could be bacterial or it could be an allergy. We have assumed the former for now and have some eye drops…
lungworm
July 11th, 2011 § 1 Comment
I first heard about lungworm when I was at the vets, a couple of years ago.
I saw a box of Advocate on the counter and posters advertising Advocate. I read what Advocate was for, and determined that I wouldn’t need it because none of the parasites it covered were those I was worried about. I concluded that this lungworm thing was all intense marketing and stirring up consumer panic to generate demand for a product, and I thought no more about it.
However, Slate has had a very slight eye irritation for a while now. It is so slight that it can look perfectly normal on some days, and on others it irritates her. I wondered if she had doggie hayfever or an allergy to something. It then occurred to me that the slight discharge from this eye is crusty dark red.
When she was ill a few weeks ago, I googled her symptoms (vomiting, lack of appetite, blood around the outside of some poos although they were firm – they were like the rind on goat’s cheese!)… And lungworm seemed a possibility. Especially since she loves to snack on grass almost every time we walk, and has been known to eat fox poo.
Although the treatment with Fish Zole appeared to work, the eye issue is still present. So I figured we may as well treat for lungworm, just to set my mind at rest.
Advocate is only effective as a prevention for lungworm, not as treatment. It only works against immature stages of lungworm, not adults. If a dog already has a lungworm infection, Advocate won’t work. In addition, it is available by vet prescription only and, as most spot-ons, it is expensive. Besides which, I really dislike using spot-ons because they are powerful pesticides which transfer to the environment (your house) and which are poisonous to fish (if you swim your dog). It’s bad enough that we have to use Advantix or the Scalibor collar in the summer months, without using spot-ons every month, all year.
The oral options are Milbemax and Panacur. For lungworm, Milbemax requires a tablet a week, for 4 weeks. The active ingredient which works against lungworm, is milbemycin oxime, yet Milbemax also contains praziquantel – which treats tapeworm. The recommendation from Milbemax is that only the first week you use a Milbemax tablet. The subsequent 3 weeks, they say you should use a ‘monovalent product containing milbemycin oxime alone’ – which would be great, if such a product existed in the UK. (It does, in the US, and is called Interceptor.) So it sounds like it might not be great for your dog, to use praziquantel every week for 4 weeks. Plus, again, it is only available by prescription.
So that leaves Panacur. Which is cheap, readily available, but a pain in the arse to administer because it has to be given for 7 days to treat lungworm. But that’s what we’re doing.
By the way, you get through a heck of a lot of Panacur treating 2 dogs over 7 days. I buy the cattle, sheep and horse Panacur 10%. It’s exactly the same product as the ‘Small Animal Panacur 10%’, but you can buy a litre of it for about £50. That should last years. I first heard about this idea from a beagle breeder, who has written a great article about intestinal worms and treating them.
GSPC Sussex working test
July 9th, 2011 § Leave a Comment
Well, I left early. In fact, I think it’s the only test I’ve ever withdrawn from. And now I’m sitting here re-thinking thoughts I’ve had before: Why am I competing in gundog work? Why do I enter these things when, by everyone’s accounts, they are such flawed forms of assessment? What about some other dog sport, like working trials? And so on.
But wait, I will back up…
So my first test was Novice Hunting, with Grey. The area was very small, brambly, with paths criss-crossing it. It was hard to get the dog off the paths because the brambly stuff wasn’t pleasant, yet dogs just looked pants if they pootled along on the path. I was not sure how to approach this, but I struck out across the brambles to encourage Grey off the paths. It was a very small area and I couldn’t believe 36 dogs were going to hunt this one patch. By the time it had finished, I felt the dogs were just getting into their stride. Anyway, we were sort of making a possibly reasonable job of it, when Grey found a dead rabbit carcass. Well, it was more of a dead rabbit leg with some fur attached to it.
At which point my heart sank; she cantered back towards me with it, proudly prancing about. She knows I don’t want her to retrieve these rotting things to me. I told her to ‘Leave’ it, but not in a very authoritative voice, as I was favouring my alternative plan of walking on very rapidly so she abandons it, in order to keep up with me. At this point, half the rabbit fell off and Grey ran on with only the skull being sickeningly crunched in her mouth. I thought -well, she can run on and crunch the skull whilst she runs, and when she’s finished it, the rest of the thing will be far back.
After a few metres, Grey spat out the skull and I said ‘Leave’ in my much more authoritative voice (!). Grey responded to this and chose to leave the skull and we hunted on. At one point, she looked like she was heading back for it, but I said ‘Leave’ again and she veered away. Shot and sit to shot were fine. But I knew that the dead rabbit debacle had lost us points. I mused on the fact that, had we been the 25th dog to run, it’s unlikely the dead rabbit would still be around causing trouble, and that this is yet another example of a non-equal test for some dogs.
I then popped Grey back in the car and collected Slate. I got very lost attempting to find Open. It was hot, Slate was hot, I was thirsty. It was getting miserable. Slate and I did a mini-tour of Sussex, by the time I found Open Hunting. The wait here was very long. I didn’t look at my watch, but it was perhaps an hour?
Whilst waiting, a conversation, which I observed and didn’t participate in, started up about working tests. One competitor announced that this would be his last test because they are so corrupt. There were stories of someone (who shall remain nameless) practising tests at a working test the previous week, on the actual test ground, beforehand and being caught doing so. Despite being reported, this individual was allowed to gain an award. It was felt that there is very much an ‘in-group’, who both test and judge, and who award each other prizes. If you report anything as being unfair, you are ‘blacklisted’ and it doesn’t count in your favour or make things any better for you.
Whether these details are true or not, I’ve no idea. But we all pass judgement on people without even being aware of it. I know that, when I approach a judge with a SRHP, deep down they don’t believe that the dog is going to be any good. Grey would have to be extra-good to counter that prejudice. (Prejudice = pre-judging.) Same goes for breeds like a Spinone or a Bracco. I’m trying to say that prejudice happens, whether conscious and malicious or not. That doesn’t make it any more acceptable. There can be measures put in place to prevent it, but until it is considered a problem, they won’t be.
As for Open Hunting: Conditions were near perfect – the sun went in, the wind picked up, and the field was an open field of long dry grass. Slate, for some reason, was in a very strange stalky-stalky mood. Meaning that only very rarely did she break into a run. Most of the time she stalked about, as if she were roading in for a point. She did actually firm up on point shortly after I let her off. It looked very nice, but I didn’t think there was much chance of any game being in this giant field after many dogs had hunted it. Sure enough, there was nothing there. End result: I ended up doing a hell of a lot of zig-zagging myself and it probably looked cack. Especially as we were preceded by a very stylish GSP who quartered perfectly whilst we all walked up the middle of the field. I was so embarrassed, I even apologised to the judge.
We then did the Open Split retrieve. This was in an open grass field. There was a dummy thrown on the right, followed by a shot and a blind far off on the left. It was a very long distance, for a blind, and the blind had to be retrieved first. Slate set out well, heading out for the blind and ignoring the seen. However, she then reached a certain distance and it was hard to get her back further. She swung around to the right, towards the seen, and I stopped her and cast her left. The first cast she got wrong, and continued right, so I stopped her again and this time she took the left. After that, it was just about pushing her back. With a lot of Backs, she got into the area and spent some time hunting for the dummy. (We ran last, out of a good many dogs, so the whole area was littered with dummy scent.) After that, I sent her for the Seen. She got into the area well, and again took a long time hunting. The judge told me that I should be more stationery when I handle. (I moved myself so that my ‘Back’ would really be a Back, and not an angle-back.) But apart from that, he said it was good – it was a tough test. However, it was easy to handle Slate because the field was an open field and she could see me to take casts, plus there was no terrain or obstacles taking her off line and affecting casts.
By now, it was lunch time. I kept an eye out for the conformation assessment which was supposed to take place during lunch, because I wanted to enter Grey. As SRHPs can only be entered in Import classes at shows, these conformation assessments at working tests are (I think) important opportunities to get someone’s opinion on your dog. However, the conformation assessment didn’t happen. No one seemed to know who was doing it or when it would be, and it just never was.
Some people in Novice had done no tests by lunch time because they were still waiting for hunting to finish (36 in Novice – why are so many entries accepted?).
After lunch I took Grey to the Novice Split retrieve. As typical for working tests, the Novice Split was actually harder than the Open. The principle was the same: Dummy thrower on the right throwing the seen, but blind on the left to be retrieved first. However, the terrain was essentially that of multiple mounds of earth, a bit like a BMX bike track – very hilly. These mounds were covered by trees, obscuring casts. There was a ditch with water in it, which ran along the edge of the moundy area, then there was a thick hedge and on the other side of this hedge was a small clearing (allegedly – not that you could see it, but were told that).
The dummy thrower was standing behind the thick hedge, throwing the Seen dummy into a small clearing, also on the far side of the hedge. So it wasn’t really a Seen, because you couldn’t see it, but you could see the thrower and hear the slap slap of the dummy! The Blind dummy was positioned in such a way that it was impossible to line the dog straight to it, because several trees and hillocks were slap bang in the middle of the line the dog would need to take. You couldn’t even see the blind dummy, unless you looked through specific trees in a specific way.
Well, Grey did her best. We are still working on holding lines even on flat terrain, and there’s no way I could expect her to hold them with all these obstacles and ‘features’ sucking her every which way. She sat to every sit whistle, and although she was sticky on a few casts, she got the general gist of most of them and made an effort to respond in the way she thought I wanted. That’s all I can ask of her. I can’t quite explain the way in which the hills sucked the dog this way and that, combined with the impossibility of seeing the dog due to trees and hills, in order to be able to handle. She did, after a hell of a lot of handling, eventually get the blind dummy. She also saw there was a PILE of blind dummies there! What role does a pile of dummies on the ground have, in a working test??
Unfortunately, when sent for the seen, the judge started to give me ‘advice’. It was well-meaning advice, telling me that there was an entry-way through to the seen along the bank (so implicitly I should let my dog get sucked away from the seen some distance). However, when I followed his ‘advice’, Grey ended up out of my sight (so unhandle-able) and heading straight back for the PILE of dummies she had seen before. By the time I had realised what was happening, and given my recall whistle to stop her picking another dummy, she had already picked one and was on her way back with it.
I then sent her again for the Seen, and this time I did what I would have done last time, left to my own devices, and pushed her back into the hedge with a lot of Backs, then a Lost when out of sight.
Once I had finished, the judge said ‘I will be marking you down for that second dummy picked from the pile’.
Well… Cheers. I’m not sure a pile of dummies on the ground has any place in a working test, for starters. Secondly, I completed the task I was told about at the start of the test, which was to send my dog for the Blind first – not the Seen. There was no further instruction given to me about how to treat the rest of the pile of blind dummies, which the dog is sure to clock when retrieving the first one! Birds do not generally fall in piles! Of course we can argue that I should be able to control my dog enough to prevent her getting anything unwanted. However, that brings me onto… Thirdly, the judge interfered in my test and gave me ‘advice’ which led my dog to be in the position of picking the wrong dummy. Fourthly, this test was way too hard for Novice. It was harder than the Split in Open, due to the terrain and cover and obstacles. I have two dogs. I enter one in Novice because that is the best class for her. What sense does it make, for Novice to be harder than Open??
At this point in the day, I am exhausted from walking backwards and forwards. The dogs have both screwed up their hunting. I know, from this, that we won’t be in the awards. The day is going very slowly and I can tell everyone is going to be there into the evening. And I’m so miffed by this Novice test. I think to myself that I don’t really enjoy working tests much. And I remember just why I jacked all this in a few years ago.
And so I withdraw. And come home.
And now I need to reassess a few things, because I’m really not enjoying gundog work with our dogs in the UK.









