2nd vet visit for lump
January 30th, 2012 § Leave a Comment
We took Slate back to the vet’s this morning for some bloods to be taken for liver function, and a fine-needle aspirate of her lump.
All went quickly and according to plan. Slate was brilliant, standing still and being brave throughout – despite being afraid.
We should have the results by Wednesday or Thursday.
Both dogs had a very nice run this morning: The first off lead walk in a fortnight, for Grey!
teaching the ‘hold’ without mouthing
January 29th, 2012 § 2 Comments
Over the past 2 weeks, whilst Grey hasn’t been able to go out on walks, I’ve been having 2 clicker sessions a day with the dogs’ regular meals.
I’ve been working on teaching the ‘hold-without-mouthing’ using the dumbbell. Once I have it on the dumbbell, I’ll generalise it to all sorts of articles.
In gundog work, the dogs bring back the game and immediately deliver it – no hanging around me with it in their mouths. They don’t sit to present it, either.
When the dogs are running and holding something, they are unlikely to mouth. I’m not exactly sure why, but I think the physical movement of running keeps the dog preoccupied and keeps their mind off rolling the thing in their mouth around.
Game being (usually) relatively heavy also discourages mouthing, since a dog which mouthed would drop it. Which is all to say that although the dogs have a fairly bullet-proof hold (in terms of never dropping) I haven’t trained no-mouthing – since they don’t mouth in gundog work. So this is something new, for me.
For working trials (and for obedience), dogs have to retrieve things and sit to present them. Then hold them (still) for some many seconds until the judge says the handler can take the article. Mouthing or rolling the article around is penalised.
The crucial thing is the timing: Getting the click when the dog’s mouth is still and not moving. This sounds simple, but mouthing can be very small, so watching very closely is needed. (This is even harder with a hairy beard hiding the mouth.) It is easy for dogs to mouth just at the moment you’re clicking, so you end up inadvertently clicking the mouthing.
So the methods all involve manipulating things in order to get good timing of the click.
Here are the things I’ve been trying:
- Distraction. When the dog is holding the object, show the dog a treat (without clicking). If you’ve taught the dog to continue to hold the object even when a treat is shown (part of the clicker retrieve), the dog will continue holding the object yet become fixated on the treat and stare at it, wanting it. Just as physical movement causes the dog to focus on that movement, and not to mouth, so does showing the dog a treat seem to cause the dog to focus on that, and to take their mind off the thing in their mouth. Then you can click and treat. If just showing the dog the treat doesn’t have this ‘stilling’ effect, you can also move it sloooowly across their field of vision, so they are tracking it with their eyes. Even more distractingly, you can also lure the dog around using the treat, which will almost always have the ‘stilling’ effect, due to the physical movement. The purpose of all this is just to buy yourself some stillness, in order to click.
- Waiting. You can wait for the dog to stop mouthing, even for a split second, and click that. The problem with this approach is: A clicker-wise dog, when the dog doesn’t get the click, is likely to try something else to get it. Like pushing the object at you, or dropping it and trying another behaviour… He or she is unlikely just to continue standing there and staring at you and is unlikely to ‘guess’ not-mouthing – since it is beyond the dog’s awareness, usually. It is very ‘punishing’ for a dog not to get a click and to ‘fail’ like this, and it can be a big blow to confidence. And one of the greatest causes of mouthing is insecurity and anxiety; mouthing usually gets worse when the dog is lacking confidence. So I don’t like this one, despite the fact that it is effectively free-shaping.
- Clicking before mouthing has started. You can only do this if the dog isn’t mouthing as soon as he takes the object. And, even when the dog isn’t mouthing at that moment, it could start just when you click, and you can end up clicking the mouthing. So trying to be quicker than the mouthing, is tricky.
- Gentle tapping of the object. For some reason, this causes the dog to bite down harder on the object to stop it from moving in the mouth. This then gives you an opportunity to click that tighter hold.
- Gentle tuggy of the object. Again, the dog takes a much firmer hold when playing tuggy and getting the dog to really grip it in that way provides an opportunity for a click. However, pulling the object (as in tuggy) and holding the object are two different things – although they do both have the firmer hold in common. Once I’d done a few reps of clicking for a gentle pull, Slate started to try to pull the tuggy away from me when I put my hand on it. Which obviously isn’t what I want, so I didn’t pursue this method further.
- Hold in a stand, in front of me. (I hold dumbbell for dog to take.)
- Hold in a sit, in front of me.
- Hold moving from a stand into a sit. (For some reason, this position-change generated lots more mouthing in both dogs and took a while. I had success with gentle tapping throughout the movement from a stand to a sit.)
- Pick-up from floor, into a sit and present.
I have to say that all this has been incredibly, incredibly tedious and boring – for me, at least. (The dogs are highly motivated and would do this forever, for the treats.) Progress was very slow and I often wondered if we were getting anywhere: No matter what degree of still-mouth we reached at the end of a session, our first hold of the next session seemed to revert right back to mouthing again – no matter how much I reduced the criteria for that first rep.
Part of the difficulty is that this is one of those instances when you’re rewarding the dog for not-doing something (rather than for doing something). And there are a million things the dog is not-doing, at that moment in time. She is not licking her bum. She is not scratching her ear. Not-mouthing the dumbbell is just one of them. So, the reason the learning is so slow, I think, is that it is much harder for the dog to understand what it is being clicked for. I also think that mouthing is usually outside of the dog’s awareness.
Feeling that I was making infinitesimally slow progress, and therefore must be doing something wrong or being incredibly stupid or over-thinking things, or not using some crucial method, I did some googling. I was reassured to find that the things I’m trying are the things others use and that it’s quite normal for progress to be bloody slow and the process boring. So I guess I will just keep on with it.
I especially found this article really good for detailing the various different things you can try. (Although some of them are more about getting duration on the hold, rather than not-mouthing, specifically. I have no problem with duration – the dogs will hold forever – it’s just the mouthing.)
missing gundog work
January 28th, 2012 § Leave a Comment
Found this photo from our trip to Jersey at Xmas and realised I hadn’t posted it. You can see the crescent moon in the sky (top left), even whilst the sun sets.
I thought of that photo because I was thinking about ‘environment’ and ‘landscape’. Bit of a tenuous link perhaps, but…
A few days ago I took Slate out to what we call ‘Bluebell Woods‘. We entered a field and I saw several pheasants fly, from further down the field.
As we approached that spot, Slate came onto a fantastic point. Which she held for about 3-5 seconds and then she rode in. This put up a further bird. She sat to whistle.
But the point isn’t what happened, which was by no means remarkable in any way. The point is that I realised that I’ve been missing all this.
There is something very ‘real’ about gundog work; very unpredictable. You can’t know what you will find when you go out, nor exactly what situation you’ll find yourself in, in what sort of cover. The dog has to show a lot of initiative in figuring things out, for herself.
And then there is an awareness of the environment which is fostered in you: Watching the landscape; noticing the wind direction; identifying likely looking patches of cover; listening for birds flushing or calling; observing your dog’s responses. It has the excitement of exploring. And it puts you in touch with nature and makes you feel part of the natural world.
This morning, I should have gone out with Slate to practise search squares and sendaways, for working trials. But the prospect of standing in a field and being concerned about the secure-hold-of-a-paperclip or the straight-line-to-a-plastic-cone just wasn’t appealing.
Just as spending the last entire week having two clicker sessions a day on ‘Hold’ (without mouthing, for several seconds) has been bloody boring to say the least. In fact, the only part of the working trials stuff I’m enjoying is the tracking. Perhaps because it does have that greater involvement with the environment and the landscape, and the same complete dependency on the dog’s natural abilities.
So I took Slate out hunting instead today. We didn’t find anything, but whistle recalls and sit whistle are still securely in place.
Next weekend is another monthly working trials training day. If Slate’s lump gets the all-clear, I could take her. But do I want to?
4th vet visit for toe & 1st vet visit for lump
January 27th, 2012 § 4 Comments
Back to the vet again today (becoming regulars there, now).
Grey’s wound has ‘done so well’ apparently. Yay! Congratulations to Grey’s wound! I was strangely proud of my fast-healing dog. (Despite all the many accounts of health issues with SRHPs, Grey has always been absurdly healthy.)
Yet, even so, the vet doesn’t want her to run off lead until MONDAY. ARG. I know it’s only 3 more days, but we are now on Day 10 of USRHPH. (Unexercised Slovakian Rough Haired Pointer Hell.) Still, what’s another 2 days? He then added that ideally it shouldn’t get wet, even then. So if it’s raining on Monday, we are supposed to wait another day! What?! And what if it’s raining THEN? Poor Grey has probably concluded she will never run off lead again, by now. (I think I will double-bag it in the waterproof bootie, if it’s raining!).
He also had a look at Slate’s lump, but he can’t tell much from looking. Here it is, if you want to not-tell-much-by-looking, too. This is towards her rear end, in line with her nipples:
He wants to do a Fine Needle Aspiration on it, as we did on the others a few years back. I told him about the slightly yellow tinge to her poo and the very yellow cow-pat poos on finishing the metronidazole, and the (once) refusal of food – and we weighed her and found that she’d lost a couple of kgs in weight. Not a great amount, and I think she had been slightly podgy the last time she was weighed. But still… So we’re also going to run some bloods to check her liver function.
But, if he took the tests today, the samples would sit in the post over the weekend and not get processed till Monday. So he wants us to go back on Monday morning and do them then.
Because of the stupid way insurance works, if the FNA comes back telling us this is a follicular cyst, we’re not covered. Since follicular cysts are now excluded from the policy as she’s had them before. We wouldn’t do any further treatment, if it were a follicular cyst, but we’d have to pay for the FNA ourselves.
On the other hand, if the FNA comes back as a mast cell tumour, then we’re covered because we haven’t had one of these before.
Despite this, you can very much guess which we’d rather it would be…
a lump on slate’s tummy
January 26th, 2012 § Leave a Comment
I would really like to be able to get back to training-related issues and to stop being so concerned about both dogs’ health…! (I have been doing a lot of clicker work indoors on ‘hold’ and ‘no-mouthing’ articles with both dogs. There is a lot to say about this, since I am unsure if I’m having much success yet!)
So far there have been no further incidents of anything which is potentially giardia coming back again. Slate is back on the WorkingHPRs, poos have been normal and her appetite has been good – except perhaps this morning she ate more slowly than usual. She also has been doing a lot of eating her own toe-nails – which can be a sign of nausea, in her. (When very nauseous she tries to eat everything: Blankets, grass, leaves – everything.) Because the way the giardia starts up is often sporadic, I’m not breathing a sigh of relief until we’ve had several more days with no problems.
Then, a couple of days ago, she cut her pad in the field. Slate is very prone to this and it happens so frequently. (Grey has never cut her pad.) This time it is one of Slate’s front pads, and even with a buster collar on, she could reach it and lick it (obsessively – which only makes it more raw). Any booties I put on her, she immediately pulled off. So she is now wearing a muzzle when I’m not in the room, since this was the only thing I could devise which would stop her from licking it.
Then, as if all that wasn’t enough, she was lying on her back last night and I noticed a lump which looked very red and raw towards the back of her belly – beyond her last nipple. She has had this lump for years but it used to be very small. It also extends under the skin somewhat and is larger than what the eye sees. I am worried it might be a mammary tumour, especially as her mother had one.
She is a very ‘lumpy’ dog, being a 7yo Weimaraner, and the majority of the lumps have been ‘fine-needle aspirated’ and come back as follicular cysts – essentially hair follicles gone mad, but benign. She also had one lump removed when she was spayed at 3yo, which again came back as a follicular cyst. So we have accepted that she is prone to follicular cysts and we don’t freak out when we find a new lump and rush to the vet. This particular lump hasn’t been FNA-ed since I forgot to point it out to the vet, it being underneath her and very small, at the time. But there is something about it which worries me, since it looks very ‘angry’ and unusual.
So I’ve made a double appointment tomorrow and I’ll be taking both dogs to the vet: Grey for her final toe-check (and hopefully discharge for off-lead walks again!) and Slate to get this lump checked out.
Never rains but it pours… At some point, I might actually be able to get around to training them and normal life might resume!
slate ill again – it never rains but it pours
January 24th, 2012 § 2 Comments
It is definitely pouring in all senses of the word, here.
Chucking it down with rain for starters, so Slate and I got soaked on our walk this morning.
And then, when we got back, Slate refused her breakfast. Last night she seemed to be feeling slightly nauseous. (When feeling nauseous she nibbles on something almost obsessively and with a strange intensity.)
This weekend just passed, one of the dogs threw up yellow bile in the night. Since Grey was wearing her buster collar and it was clean, I figured this was Slate. At the time, I put it down to a one-off thing.
But now, slowly, the symptoms mount up. This is, as usual, how it starts.
Great, so now I have two sick dogs of one kind or another.
I’m not going to put Slate back on my secret supply of metronidazole – FishZole. Doing it again just one month since the last time without going to the vet, well I’m just not going to do that.
I did change her food yesterday, since we finished a sack of Mike’s WorkingHPRs food and I had put her on Arden Grange Lamb & Rice. (I tend to just pick up whichever of the decent foods are on special offer.) I’ve now put her back on the WorkingHPRs and we’ll see what happens. But she has been fine on AG Lamb and Rice before, so I doubt it’s that.
I very much suspect this is going to result in more vet visits; more money spent; more poo samples; more runny bloody poos; more cleaning up sick; more trying to prevent nauseous dog from eating bedding, and so on…
Sheesh.
3rd vet visit for toe…
January 23rd, 2012 § Leave a Comment
Back to the vet again today, for our 3rd appointment concerning Grey’s toe.
This is Day 6 of what I am calling ‘Unexercised Slovakian Rough Haired Pointer Hell’, or USRHPH for short.
The vet said the wound looked ‘really good’ and he could tell there had been absolutely no self-trauma to it. (That being because she has been wearing a buster collar and a sock!)
But he said she couldn’t have off lead walks yet.
It was hard to tell how much this was common-sense and based on factually how likely the wound was to come open – and how much it was about a litigious society and a fear of being sued or held responsible if a dog was walked too early and the stitches did break – no matter how unlikely this was to happen.
Since this wasn’t really something I could politely ask him, we have to take his advice.
He wanted to see us again on Monday, but I persuaded him to see us on Friday instead – I can’t take another weekend of Grey climbing the walls with no exercise.
Friday will be Day 10 of USRHPH.
why does the UK still have only a FTCH title?
January 22nd, 2012 § Leave a Comment
In many other countries, breeders and puppy buyers can make very informed decisions about where to purchase a puppy from, for working purposes, and which dogs to use as breeding stock – because the dogs on a pedigree have a host of detailed titles and awards after and before their names, which provide useful information about the abilities of dogs on the pedigree.
Many countries in mainland Europe require dogs pass specific tests before breeding. The Slovakian Rough Haired Pointer Club in Slovakia have these tests, for example, which they use to select breeding stock. Weimaraners in Germany are subject to similar requirements.
Here is a list of titles available in the US, which would be meaningful to a US field Weim breeder, on a pedigree:
- JH – Junior Hunter
- SH – Senior Hunter
- MH – Master Hunter
- AFC – Amateur Field Champion
- FC - Field Champion
- NAFC – National Amateur Field Champion
- NFC – National Field Champion
- RDX – Retrieving Dog Excellent
- RD – Retrieving Dog
- NRD – Novice Retrieving Dog
- SDX – Shooting Dog Excellent
- SD – Shooting Dog
- NSD – Novice Shooting Dog
- UT – Prize 1/2/3 – Utility score
- UPT – Prize 1/2/3 – Utility Prep score
- NA – Prize 1/2/3 – Natural Ability score
- VC – Versatile Champion
- HAE – Hunting Aptitude Evaluation
- AHAE – Advanced Hunting Aptitude Evaluation
- PE – Performance Evaluation
- FTCh
That is IT. There are no ‘lesser’ field awards which confer titles. It is no wonder that many breeders try to create a title by putting FTW in front of dogs’ names (Field Trial Winner), but this isn’t a KC recognised title. We also have the Working Gundog Certificate – but this does not confer a title on the dog, either, and would not appear on the pedigree. Gundog working tests never result in titles.
How many UK Weimaraners have ever become UK FTChs? TWO. Ever.
Just to spell out what that means: Looking at a UK Weimaraner’s pedigree can tell you absolutely nothing about the working ability of any of the individual dogs on it. Unless you personally knew those dogs behind your dog, you have no information on them.
By comparison, how many show titles are available, in the UK?
- ShCh – Show Champion
- ShCoM – Show Certificate of Merit
- JW – Junior Warrant
And how many UK Weimaraners have become ShChs? Loads. How many exactly? Well, I could find out for sure, but I’d guess it’s in the hundreds. Both Slate’s parents were UK ShChs, owned by the same breeder.
The problem isn’t just the lack of titles, it’s that in order to improve the situation and to breed more dogs with field ability, UK breeders need to be able to select for that ability in the field. And just how do they go about that, when in the UK there is no information on the proven field abilities of any dogs behind a particular dog? You can go by what the single, individual, dog in front of you is like – but that’s breeding purely for phenotype and not genotype. Who knows what might get thrown up, from previous generations? It’s entirely random and therefore hardly selective at all.
In breeds with more FTChs, it is much more possible to select for field ability. In the UK, GSPs have something in the region of 45 FTChs (ever). This means there are a great deal more FTChs appearing on GSP pedigrees than on Weimaraner pedigrees. Which, in turn, means that it’s possible to breed and buy puppies with that information in mind, and to improve the breed in the field even more. The same is even more true of breeds like labradors and spaniels, which have even more FTChs on pedigrees. By comparison, Weimaraners (and other minority HPR breeds) can’t get out of the Catch-22 situation they’re in without ‘lesser’ achievements being recognised, so that some sort of selective breeding can begin.
Finally, even when a titled dog is imported from abroad into the UK, most foreign titles are stripped from it: The UK KC refuses to recognise many titles from other countries on UK pedigrees. Grey’s great-grandfather in Slovakia was IntCh Koro Hajasov Dvor FS, JS, VP, I.c., MJS II.c., SO3. How do I know this? Because I have looked it up on Slovakian pedigrees, where the titles appear. On her UK pedigree, he appears as just IntCh Koro Hajasov Dvor.
And what is the IntCh bit? Yes, a show title, which the UK KC, in their infinite wisdom, will recognise.
More, anon.
2nd vet visit for toe…
January 20th, 2012 § Leave a Comment
Today was our check-up for Grey’s toe-stitches.
The vet cut away the bandage (thank god, our street cred was suffering badly, with a pink bandage and purple hearts).
He said the wound was ‘oozing’ slightly, which I believe means it’s a bit infected – although he didn’t seem overly concerned. He gave us a longer course of antibiotics and said that it should ‘air’ now, without a bandage… BUT even two licks of it from Grey would ‘set us back to square one’.
So I came home armed with an even bigger Buster collar, since Grey can just about reach her foot in certain positions with the Buster collar that I had before. Having put the new Buster collar on, it looks like she can still reach her foot in certain positions – ie if she lies down and brings her back legs forwards, she can just get them within the radius of the Buster collar. Damn. She is wearing a doggie bootie, but I’d really like it to air-dry properly – but I don’t see how I can risk her licking it.
I also picked up some more of the most excellent Vivitreats, which are about the only way I can disguise tablets for Grey. Slate just wolfs everything down without even caring what it is. Grey is deeply suspicious and will eat it and then swallow the sausage or ham or whatever you’ve wrapped it in, then spit out the tablet. The Vivitreats, though, go right down the hatch!
The vet also said I should keep her CALM. And not changing directions or splaying her toes a lot.
Then we left the consultation room, and Grey was so relieved not to be going ‘back-stage’ for treatment today that she attempted to leap around in her excitement and relief. Sheesh. Does this vet know how hard it is to keep a SRHP calm when she’s getting no exercise??
We have to go back to the vet again on Monday. Bummer.
senior dog supplements
January 19th, 2012 § 2 Comments
A while back, I posted about foods for senior dogs.
I decided to give the ProPlan a go. Being a big brand commercial food, it’s not the sort of thing I’ve fed in the past. But the marketing hype about it being targeted specifically at senior dogs got me.
Well, the kibble was extremely small. Maybe if your dog was a geriatric toy poodle with no teeth, this size kibble would suit you. But Slate has all her teeth in perfect working order and inhales this kibble. Plus, being so small, it is very difficult to train with: The dog doesn’t see it when you throw it on the floor and then spends ages snuffling around for it.
It is quite pale in colour, and what came out the other end was also pale, which doesn’t convince me that it has a good amount of meat in it.
Then, when Slate was recovering from her recent bout of giardia, she got yellow poo. When I took her off the ProPlan and put her on NatureDiet Fish and Rice, the poos went back to their normal colour. I didn’t dare put her back on the ProPlan again, in case that had something to do with the yellow poo – so Grey has been finishing it off – although, at 4 yrs, she is not a senior dog!
In short: Not a success.
So, I then had a rethink about what to do for Slate, now she’s getting older. Since there don’t appear to be any suitable foods for senior dogs which aren’t just more grains and less meat, I’ve decided to use two supplements:
Salmon oil from Fish4Dogs, which is rich in Omega 3 and should be good for brain function – since it offsets dementia in older people.
And Joint Aid, which contains glucosamine and chondroitin amongst others, for healthy joints in older age.
I’ll just keep feeding her as I am, but add these supplements in. Let’s hope it keeps her leaping around for years to come.






